Critics: Ohio case fits wider pattern of quieting fracking foes | Midwest Energy News

A lawsuit filed by an Ohio company last month seeks to remove two anti-fracking billboards near a wastewater site it operates.

While the case is a test of free speech, critics say it also reflects a broader reluctance for businesses and regulatory agencies in the state to adequately inform citizens about shale gas activities and address their concerns.

Fracking is the use of chemically treated water and sand to crack and prop open rock so oil and gas can flow out. Fracking a horizontal shale well can take millions of gallons of water. In Ohio, most of the wastewater that can’t be reused goes into underground injection wells.

Ohio’s regulatory environment is allowing rapid expansion of the shale gas industry. The state’s natural gas production nearly doubled from 2012 to 2013. And shale wastewater injection for 2013 was up more than 2 million barrels from the previous year.

Critics say the system fast-tracks permits for activities related to shale gas at the expense of public comment and citizen input.

Growth in the industry is “happening in a way that communities are not necessarily always well-informed,” said Megan Lovett, a lawyer with Fair Shake Environmental Legal Services in Pittsburgh.

Lovett believes that situation makes it even more important to defend concerned citizens’ right to speak out. Her firm is currently consulting with defense counsel in the Ohio lawsuit.

‘Poisoned waters’

Buckeye Brine and Rodney Adams have sued Mike Boals of Coshocton, Ohio, for putting up side-by-side signs on rented billboards a few hundred feet from the company’s deep injection well site.

The wells dispose of wastewater from fracked wells in Ohio and from out of state. That type of wastewater typically has high levels of salt and can also contain heavy metals and dissolved radioactive materials, such as radium.

One billboard says in part that the nearby injection wells “pump POISONED WATERS under the feet of America’s Citizens. The waters come from Shale Oil and Gas development that contaminates and destroys America’s water.” The sign’s list of local participants names Adams and groups of government officials.

The other billboard includes a statement that “DEATH may come,” followed by references from the Book of Revelations.

The plaintiffs want the state court to order Boals to remove the billboards and not to make “any false statement of fact or statements that imply false statements of fact, publicly or to any person….” They also ask for an unstated amount of money, punitive damages and attorney’s fees.

The complaint claims Boals’ behavior in putting up the billboards amounts to defamation, wrongful interference with contractual relations, business disparagement, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

“We think that these claims are totally baseless, and they’re just an intent to bully him,” Lovett said.

Limits on speaking out

Worries about bullying have popped up elsewhere in Ohio too.

This summer, Caitlin Johnson of the Ohio Organizing Collaborative has been working on a “listening project” in rural Ohio. The survey’s goal is to learn about people’s concerns about shale gas activities in their communities.

Many residents would only speak on condition of anonymity, Johnson said in June when she met with journalists in Carroll County, Ohio. The meeting was part of a Shale Country Institute organized by the Institute for Journalism & Natural Resources.

Many people were “so scared” of possible reprisals if they spoke out publicly against changes that many businesses and local government officials welcomed, Johnson noted.

“People are being bullied,” she said.

Many people who did answer her survey worried about the social impacts of shale gas activities, Johnson said. They saw the rural, close-knit nature of their communities changing with heavy traffic and a flood of outsiders working in the industry. Rents and prices at grocery stores seemed to be “way up.”

Along those lines, Boals said there is now an “extreme amount of tanker trucks you see on the highway streaming into Coshocton.”

“It would be really unfortunate if this [lawsuit] would deter more concerned people from speaking out,” Johnson said earlier this week.

Actions by the Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR) have also thwarted citizens’ attempts to speak out against fracking and related activities, Johnson said. ODNR staffers showed up with at least 14 armed personnel and a dog at one 2013 meeting in Portage County.

Even when citizens can submit written comments, the usual 15-day comment period is too short, said Brian Kunkemoeller of the Sierra Club’s Beyond Natural Gas program.

“This is simply not enough time here for the community to become aware, get educated, and get involved,” Kunkemoeller noted.

Nor does the Ohio Oil & Gas Commission let citizens appeal from the grant of an injection well permit, he added.

“Quite frankly, citizens have no meaningful venues for objecting to frack waste disposal, nor do most of them have real opportunities to know these things are happening in their community,” Kunkemoeller said.

via Critics: Ohio case fits wider pattern of quieting fracking foes | Midwest Energy News.